NATO chief to U.S.: Not running from Afghan fight
By Phil Stewart
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The new head of NATO sought to ease American doubts about allies' commitment to the stalled Afghan war on Monday but cautioned that European states would prefer to send more trainers than combat troops.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, in his first major U.S. address as secretary-general, said fading public opinion meant it was all the more urgent to show there was "light at the end of the tunnel" by training Afghan forces for a gradual handover.
"We should expand our training mission. I consider it easier for European countries to contribute to our training mission with personnel as well as with finances, than with combat troops," he said, answering questions from an audience at the Atlantic Council, a public policy group in Washington.
Rasmussen's comments came on the same day as European defense ministers, meeting informally in Sweden, expressed reluctance to send a significant number of reinforcements.
"If you look at Europe, I don't hear any voices saying we have an additional five or ten thousand soldiers to send to Afghanistan," said Danish Defense Minister Soren Gade.
The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, has warned the Afghan effort will likely result in failure without more troops. He is expected to seek 30,000 to 40,000 combat troops and trainers, according to defense and congressional officials.
European allies are not expected to offer any significant increase in trainers or troops unless the United States takes the lead.
But U.S. President Barack Obama, who is also working to reduce the U.S. military presence in Iraq, has said he will not decide on further reinforcements for Afghanistan until after a broad review of strategy.
Senator John Kerry, the influential chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and an Obama ally, urged against committing more troops without clear goals or a timeframe.
"Otherwise, we risk bringing our troops home from a mission unachieved or poorly conceived," Kerry said in an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal published on Monday.
Rasmussen, who meets Obama on Tuesday, told reporters it was premature to discuss McChrystal's request for additional troops, saying that issue was best left "for another stage."
NOT RUNNING FROM THE FIGHT
The former prime minister of Denmark, who took over NATO's top job last month, criticized those in the United States who belittle the contributions of allies.
In his speech, Rasmussen pointed to 9,000 additional non-U.S. troops who have joined the Afghan effort in the past 18 months, saying "the allies are not running from the fight, despite the conventional wisdom."
Such U.S. criticism was counterproductive, unjustified and risked leaving allies "less inclined to make those efforts and those sacrifices" in the future, he said.
"I am a little concerned about the doubts I hear these days in the United States about NATO," Rasmussen said.
"Talking down the European and Canadian contributions -- as some in the United States do on occasion -- can become a self-fulfilling prophesy."
The Netherlands and Canada already have set 2010 and 2011 withdrawal timelines. Still, Rasmussen said NATO "will stay for as long as it takes to succeed."
"None of this will be quick and none of it will be easy," he said. "We will need to have patience. We will need more resources. And, unfortunately, we will lose more young soldiers to the terrorist attacks of the Taliban."
McChrystal's leaked assessment included withering criticism of NATO's International Security Assistance Force, saying that troops often lacked basic understanding of Afghan society.
Rasmussen said he was aware of frustrations in Washington, including restrictions some NATO nations put on their forces and delays in NATO decision-making.
"I am already working hard to address those very real problems," he said.
The Pentagon said on Monday any additional deployments would not happen until next year, even if Obama approved them immediately.
"There is a certain amount of train-up that is required to prepare for a particular battlespace and there is a certain amount of logistics in terms of moving equipment," Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said.
(Additional reporting by Adam Entous in Washington; Mia Shanley and Niklas Pollard in Gothenburg, Sweden and David Brunnstrom in Brussels; Editing by John O'Callaghan)
Permalink Comments off